<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media in Action: Twitter and Emergency Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/</link>
	<description>Exploring the strategery of using social media within the government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sradick</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>sradick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-168</guid>
		<description>John - you bring up an excellent point about not existing in a vacuum. Whether it&#039;s Twitter or YouTube or any other form of social media, it&#039;s important that what you&#039;re saying there is consistent with what your organization says in the mainstream media.  That&#039;s why successful social media efforts are integrated into the larger organizational strategy - you can&#039;t have all of your social media efforts handled by that &quot;crazy Steve guy&quot; down the hall while your public affairs officers have no idea what he&#039;s tweeting or blogging about.  It should all be visible and open - &quot;oh, that stuff is too high tech for me to understand&quot; should NEVER be an acceptable response from a communications professional anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; you bring up an excellent point about not existing in a vacuum. Whether it&#8217;s Twitter or YouTube or any other form of social media, it&#8217;s important that what you&#8217;re saying there is consistent with what your organization says in the mainstream media.  That&#8217;s why successful social media efforts are integrated into the larger organizational strategy &#8211; you can&#8217;t have all of your social media efforts handled by that &#8220;crazy Steve guy&#8221; down the hall while your public affairs officers have no idea what he&#8217;s tweeting or blogging about.  It should all be visible and open &#8211; &#8220;oh, that stuff is too high tech for me to understand&#8221; should NEVER be an acceptable response from a communications professional anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sradick</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-5207</link>
		<dc:creator>sradick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-5207</guid>
		<description>John - you bring up an excellent point about not existing in a vacuum. Whether it&#039;s Twitter or YouTube or any other form of social media, it&#039;s important that what you&#039;re saying there is consistent with what your organization says in the mainstream media.  That&#039;s why successful social media efforts are integrated into the larger organizational strategy - you can&#039;t have all of your social media efforts handled by that &quot;crazy Steve guy&quot; down the hall while your public affairs officers have no idea what he&#039;s tweeting or blogging about.  It should all be visible and open - &quot;oh, that stuff is too high tech for me to understand&quot; should NEVER be an acceptable response from a communications professional anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John &#8211; you bring up an excellent point about not existing in a vacuum. Whether it&#8217;s Twitter or YouTube or any other form of social media, it&#8217;s important that what you&#8217;re saying there is consistent with what your organization says in the mainstream media.  That&#8217;s why successful social media efforts are integrated into the larger organizational strategy &#8211; you can&#8217;t have all of your social media efforts handled by that &#8220;crazy Steve guy&#8221; down the hall while your public affairs officers have no idea what he&#8217;s tweeting or blogging about.  It should all be visible and open &#8211; &#8220;oh, that stuff is too high tech for me to understand&#8221; should NEVER be an acceptable response from a communications professional anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FEMAinFocus</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>FEMAinFocus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-167</guid>
		<description>You are right about the value of social media tools for emergency communications.

FEMA is in fact using twitter. We do have to be careful, though, and make sure we are supporting Incident Command principles and not overstepping what state and local officials are saying / tweeting.  We search Twitter based on (FEMA) user location for people seeking information or asking questions.  Twitters is proving not only useful in disaster responses, but also during recoveries to provide customer service and education. We are using YouTube to help tell complex stories as well.

I think the more folks who see the value in engaging the government in these tools, the better we will all be able to shape useful communications for emergencies.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right about the value of social media tools for emergency communications.</p>
<p>FEMA is in fact using twitter. We do have to be careful, though, and make sure we are supporting Incident Command principles and not overstepping what state and local officials are saying / tweeting.  We search Twitter based on (FEMA) user location for people seeking information or asking questions.  Twitters is proving not only useful in disaster responses, but also during recoveries to provide customer service and education. We are using YouTube to help tell complex stories as well.</p>
<p>I think the more folks who see the value in engaging the government in these tools, the better we will all be able to shape useful communications for emergencies.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FEMAinFocus</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-5206</link>
		<dc:creator>FEMAinFocus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-5206</guid>
		<description>You are right about the value of social media tools for emergency communications.

FEMA is in fact using twitter. We do have to be careful, though, and make sure we are supporting Incident Command principles and not overstepping what state and local officials are saying / tweeting.  We search Twitter based on (FEMA) user location for people seeking information or asking questions.  Twitters is proving not only useful in disaster responses, but also during recoveries to provide customer service and education. We are using YouTube to help tell complex stories as well.

I think the more folks who see the value in engaging the government in these tools, the better we will all be able to shape useful communications for emergencies.

John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right about the value of social media tools for emergency communications.</p>
<p>FEMA is in fact using twitter. We do have to be careful, though, and make sure we are supporting Incident Command principles and not overstepping what state and local officials are saying / tweeting.  We search Twitter based on (FEMA) user location for people seeking information or asking questions.  Twitters is proving not only useful in disaster responses, but also during recoveries to provide customer service and education. We are using YouTube to help tell complex stories as well.</p>
<p>I think the more folks who see the value in engaging the government in these tools, the better we will all be able to shape useful communications for emergencies.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carroll Stuart</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>Carroll Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-90</guid>
		<description>dj6t526vowrqsod0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dj6t526vowrqsod0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carroll Stuart</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-5205</link>
		<dc:creator>Carroll Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-5205</guid>
		<description>dj6t526vowrqsod0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dj6t526vowrqsod0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phardee</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>phardee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Hi, Steve--I can see the benefits of Twittering in emergency situations. Looking at the timeline between your first tweet and the FOX5 announcement is impressive. But one of your points gave me pause--&quot;they would be able to pinpoint to the minute where people were, and what they were doing.&quot; That&#039;s great in the case of emergencies or terrorist situations, but from a privacy point of view, I find it scary. I&#039;m not sure I would want my location and activities to be pinpointed every minute of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Steve&#8211;I can see the benefits of Twittering in emergency situations. Looking at the timeline between your first tweet and the FOX5 announcement is impressive. But one of your points gave me pause&#8211;&#8221;they would be able to pinpoint to the minute where people were, and what they were doing.&#8221; That&#8217;s great in the case of emergencies or terrorist situations, but from a privacy point of view, I find it scary. I&#8217;m not sure I would want my location and activities to be pinpointed every minute of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phardee</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-5204</link>
		<dc:creator>phardee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-5204</guid>
		<description>Hi, Steve--I can see the benefits of Twittering in emergency situations. Looking at the timeline between your first tweet and the FOX5 announcement is impressive. But one of your points gave me pause--&quot;they would be able to pinpoint to the minute where people were, and what they were doing.&quot; That&#039;s great in the case of emergencies or terrorist situations, but from a privacy point of view, I find it scary. I&#039;m not sure I would want my location and activities to be pinpointed every minute of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Steve&#8211;I can see the benefits of Twittering in emergency situations. Looking at the timeline between your first tweet and the FOX5 announcement is impressive. But one of your points gave me pause&#8211;&#8221;they would be able to pinpoint to the minute where people were, and what they were doing.&#8221; That&#8217;s great in the case of emergencies or terrorist situations, but from a privacy point of view, I find it scary. I&#8217;m not sure I would want my location and activities to be pinpointed every minute of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-20</guid>
		<description>@sradick - Interesting point about Kaiser. I agree it wouldn&#039;t be feasible for @911 to trigger an ambulance, but setting up a folksonomy of an @user name or #topic would help first responders, reporters, etc. more effectively search twitter feeds. After all, these people listen to police scanners, not every shortwave radio frequency -- they need to weed through the chaff and get to the good stuff. If a bunch of people in one location start twittering with @911 or #emergency, then the authorities can be alerted fairly easily, vice the uncoordinated words/categories you and the other twitterers used at JFK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sradick &#8211; Interesting point about Kaiser. I agree it wouldn&#8217;t be feasible for @911 to trigger an ambulance, but setting up a folksonomy of an @user name or #topic would help first responders, reporters, etc. more effectively search twitter feeds. After all, these people listen to police scanners, not every shortwave radio frequency &#8212; they need to weed through the chaff and get to the good stuff. If a bunch of people in one location start twittering with @911 or #emergency, then the authorities can be alerted fairly easily, vice the uncoordinated words/categories you and the other twitterers used at JFK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KT</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2008/09/23/social-media-in-action-twitter-and-emergency-response/comment-page-1/#comment-5203</link>
		<dc:creator>KT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=60#comment-5203</guid>
		<description>@sradick - Interesting point about Kaiser. I agree it wouldn&#039;t be feasible for @911 to trigger an ambulance, but setting up a folksonomy of an @user name or #topic would help first responders, reporters, etc. more effectively search twitter feeds. After all, these people listen to police scanners, not every shortwave radio frequency -- they need to weed through the chaff and get to the good stuff. If a bunch of people in one location start twittering with @911 or #emergency, then the authorities can be alerted fairly easily, vice the uncoordinated words/categories you and the other twitterers used at JFK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sradick &#8211; Interesting point about Kaiser. I agree it wouldn&#8217;t be feasible for @911 to trigger an ambulance, but setting up a folksonomy of an @user name or #topic would help first responders, reporters, etc. more effectively search twitter feeds. After all, these people listen to police scanners, not every shortwave radio frequency &#8212; they need to weed through the chaff and get to the good stuff. If a bunch of people in one location start twittering with @911 or #emergency, then the authorities can be alerted fairly easily, vice the uncoordinated words/categories you and the other twitterers used at JFK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

