<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0 Reflects the Culture</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/</link>
	<description>Exploring the strategery of using social media within the government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon White</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-2350</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-2350</guid>
		<description>Thank you for writing this, I can not find an information which is so clear and through up to now. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mbi.com.tr/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Erp, customer relationship management &lt;/A&gt;are my favourites, please check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for writing this, I can not find an information which is so clear and through up to now. <a href="http://www.mbi.com.tr/" rel="nofollow">Erp, customer relationship management </a>are my favourites, please check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrightMagnet (Jean-Marie Bonthous)</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>BrightMagnet (Jean-Marie Bonthous)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/BrightMagnet&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;BrightMagnet (Jean-Marie Bonthous)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;BrightMagnet (Jean-Marie Bonthous)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://purl.org/net/spiurl/BrightMagnet&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
RT @sradick Enterprise 2.0 Reflects the Culture &#124; Social Media Strategery [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/BrightMagnet" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div class="ccimg1" title="BrightMagnet (Jean-Marie Bonthous)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;">
<img name="cc_image" title="BrightMagnet (Jean-Marie Bonthous)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;" src="http://purl.org/net/spiurl/BrightMagnet"/>
</div>
<p></a><br />
RT @sradick Enterprise 2.0 Reflects the Culture | Social Media Strategery [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The cultural factor&#160;&#124;&#160;Scicada</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>The cultural factor&#160;&#124;&#160;Scicada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 19:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>[...] as Steve Radick put it: If the “social” part of social media doesn’t exist within your organization or is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Steve Radick put it: If the “social” part of social media doesn’t exist within your organization or is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sradick</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>sradick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>Scott, you brought up a lot of interesting and philosophical points but I&#039;ll add on to your first one - I really like the alien analogy.  Similarly, I like to ask my social media skeptics this: &quot;What if wikis had been invented first, before there was email??  What if we showed them this picture (http://matwww.ee.tut.fi/~huhtis/koulutus/2009/vy/verkkoyhteisot/kuva/wiki-vs-email.jpg) and asked them to pick which one made the most sense for collaboration?

The problem with corporate adoption of social media tools and Enterprise 2.0 technology is that it&#039;s usually too focused on deploying the new tools instead of using the tools to help change the processes and the way people work.  Enterprise 2.0 isn&#039;t a set of tools or a new technology - it&#039;s a new way of working that is facilitated by the new technology.  You can&#039;t use same old processes with new technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, you brought up a lot of interesting and philosophical points but I&#8217;ll add on to your first one &#8211; I really like the alien analogy.  Similarly, I like to ask my social media skeptics this: &#8220;What if wikis had been invented first, before there was email??  What if we showed them this picture (<a href="http://matwww.ee.tut.fi/~huhtis/koulutus/2009/vy/verkkoyhteisot/kuva/wiki-vs-email.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://matwww.ee.tut.fi/~huhtis/koulutus/2009/vy/verkkoyhteisot/kuva/wiki-vs-email.jpg</a>) and asked them to pick which one made the most sense for collaboration?</p>
<p>The problem with corporate adoption of social media tools and Enterprise 2.0 technology is that it&#8217;s usually too focused on deploying the new tools instead of using the tools to help change the processes and the way people work.  Enterprise 2.0 isn&#8217;t a set of tools or a new technology &#8211; it&#8217;s a new way of working that is facilitated by the new technology.  You can&#8217;t use same old processes with new technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bryan</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>I try to understand things from the perspective of an alien scientist studying our planet.  It just seems so bizarrely ironic that our greatest fear seems to be exploitation from someone else and how it shapes everything about us.  It&#039;s obvious why this is the case--we&#039;re best described as creatures designed to outwit and exploit our surroundings (including ourselves.)

What isn&#039;t clear is why we don&#039;t address that fact.  Why we don&#039;t search for that economy and infrastructure which would leave us predisposed to empower and enrich our world rather than exploit it.  Why does everyone seem to subconsciously conclude that would be impossible?  It only requires redressing the externalities that leave us predisposed to exploit in the first place.  We got here honestly, in a world where creatures changed over evolutionary time and simply couldn&#039;t outrun their own impact.  That is no longer the case.  We can change the world far faster than we can adapt to it.

The internet is the neurogenesis of a genuine, independent, meta-consciousness.  It still seems to be stumbling to find a model for forming useful neurons; the means to add significant value by virtue of the way we interact with each other and the information itself.  Yet we still haven&#039;t come to grips with the most fundamental dysfunction of our predicament; that most aspects of our world predispose us to outwit and exploit each other rather than enrich or empower.

I write this (and do realize this is somewhat off-topic; meta-topic?) only because the internet seems to be the only place we actually might be able to, for example, ensure that the various minds involved in the crystallization of great knowledge are all property credited.  And that I honestly believe we&#039;ve unwittingly built a world that is a bit backwards; I see people enjoy what they do for others more than anything else.  Just imagine how awesome work would be if the economic rewards matched the emotional ones?

Google&#039;s WAVE technology seems to be an effort to do this, but I think it is a better model for most organizations that are looking for ways to wring more utility out of their intellectual capital.  Especially if it evolves into an encapsulation of entire projects--turning them into data in their own right and promising a quantum leap in our capacity to rapidly deploy extreme competency in response to every challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I try to understand things from the perspective of an alien scientist studying our planet.  It just seems so bizarrely ironic that our greatest fear seems to be exploitation from someone else and how it shapes everything about us.  It&#8217;s obvious why this is the case&#8211;we&#8217;re best described as creatures designed to outwit and exploit our surroundings (including ourselves.)</p>
<p>What isn&#8217;t clear is why we don&#8217;t address that fact.  Why we don&#8217;t search for that economy and infrastructure which would leave us predisposed to empower and enrich our world rather than exploit it.  Why does everyone seem to subconsciously conclude that would be impossible?  It only requires redressing the externalities that leave us predisposed to exploit in the first place.  We got here honestly, in a world where creatures changed over evolutionary time and simply couldn&#8217;t outrun their own impact.  That is no longer the case.  We can change the world far faster than we can adapt to it.</p>
<p>The internet is the neurogenesis of a genuine, independent, meta-consciousness.  It still seems to be stumbling to find a model for forming useful neurons; the means to add significant value by virtue of the way we interact with each other and the information itself.  Yet we still haven&#8217;t come to grips with the most fundamental dysfunction of our predicament; that most aspects of our world predispose us to outwit and exploit each other rather than enrich or empower.</p>
<p>I write this (and do realize this is somewhat off-topic; meta-topic?) only because the internet seems to be the only place we actually might be able to, for example, ensure that the various minds involved in the crystallization of great knowledge are all property credited.  And that I honestly believe we&#8217;ve unwittingly built a world that is a bit backwards; I see people enjoy what they do for others more than anything else.  Just imagine how awesome work would be if the economic rewards matched the emotional ones?</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s WAVE technology seems to be an effort to do this, but I think it is a better model for most organizations that are looking for ways to wring more utility out of their intellectual capital.  Especially if it evolves into an encapsulation of entire projects&#8211;turning them into data in their own right and promising a quantum leap in our capacity to rapidly deploy extreme competency in response to every challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goetz (Götz)</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-1015</link>
		<dc:creator>goetz (Götz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-1015</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;FriendFeed Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/goetz&quot; title=&quot;FriendFeed Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;goetz (Götz)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;goetz (Götz)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/goetz/picture?size=medium&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
Ente... [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>FriendFeed Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://friendfeed.com/goetz" title="FriendFeed Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div class="ccimg1" title="goetz (Götz)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;">
<img name="cc_image" title="goetz (Götz)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;" src="http://friendfeed.com/goetz/picture?size=medium"/>
</div>
<p></a><br />
Ente&#8230; [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by libel</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-937</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by libel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-937</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by libel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by libel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libel (Marga van Rijssel)</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-936</link>
		<dc:creator>libel (Marga van Rijssel)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 22:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-936</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Twitter Comment&lt;/strong&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/libel&quot; title=&quot;Twitter Comment&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;ccimg1&quot; title=&quot;libel (Marga van Rijssel)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;&quot;&gt;
&lt;img name=&quot;cc_image&quot; title=&quot;libel (Marga van Rijssel)&quot; style=&quot;float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;&quot; src=&quot;http://purl.org/net/spiurl/libel&quot;&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/a&gt;
Enterprise 2.0 Reflects the Culture [link to post]&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://chatcatcher.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Posted using Chat Catcher&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Twitter Comment</strong><br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/libel" title="Twitter Comment" rel="nofollow"></p>
<div class="ccimg1" title="libel (Marga van Rijssel)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:60px;height:60px;">
<img name="cc_image" title="libel (Marga van Rijssel)" style="float:left;margin-right:10px;padding:0;width:50px;height:50px;" src="http://purl.org/net/spiurl/libel"/>
</div>
<p></a><br />
Enterprise 2.0 Reflects the Culture [link to post]</p>
<p> &#8211; <a href="http://chatcatcher.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Posted using Chat Catcher</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lessons from &#8220;Why Software Sucks&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Lessons from &#8220;Why Software Sucks&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-909</guid>
		<description>[...] recent blogs by Barry Camson, Sameer Patel, Susan Scrupski, Paula Thornton, Hutch Carpenter, Steve Radick, and many others on the topic of e.20 adoption and culture.  It&#8217;s an important discussion. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent blogs by Barry Camson, Sameer Patel, Susan Scrupski, Paula Thornton, Hutch Carpenter, Steve Radick, and many others on the topic of e.20 adoption and culture.  It&#8217;s an important discussion. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://steveradick.com/2009/06/18/enterprise-2-0-reflects-the-culture/comment-page-1/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveradick.com/?p=604#comment-901</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a brillaint analogy Gil - especially the facet of people who will find a way to exercise without the treadmill.

I&#039;ll share this with my team and give you credit for it (sorry, no tipjoy!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a brillaint analogy Gil &#8211; especially the facet of people who will find a way to exercise without the treadmill.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll share this with my team and give you credit for it (sorry, no tipjoy!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
